GCC Draft Proposal

From NVCWiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Click here to return to the main CNVC Board page.

Contents

GCC Draft Proposal

Notice to visitors: The version of this document posted here contains amendments contributed by members in the Governing Circle that has developed since the original version was accepted by the Board as 'a working document for the structure of CNVC' during a teleconference that took place during May 2006.

To obtain a clearer understanding of what has and has not been ratified as 'current policy', please find the original version at www.cnvc.org. and view CGG/Board minutes to see updates.


This was Initially drafted at the Albuquerque Strategy Session, 19 - 20 March 2006 for proposal to the Network and the Board. Group Present: Marshall Rosenberg, Valentina Rosenberg, Jori Manske, Jim Manske, John Buck, Stefan Wisbauer, Barbara Larson.

In May 2006, follow a period of comment by the NVC Network, the following was approved by the Board of CNVC by consent:

The Board is establishing procedures to insure representation by inviting present large geographic groups of one or more countries involved in NVC to nominate representatives by consent of their group to a newly constituted Global Coordinating Circle (GCC), which will serve as the guiding body for the international NVC community including CNVC. At the point where the Board accepts the first person nominated by an NVC region to the Board, the Board will rename itself the GCC.

The following is offered as background, support and definition for this proposal:

1. Observations

The NVC movement has seen impressive growth in recent years and is conducting an impressive breadth of activities in a large number of geographies.

Strong potential exists for further growth and meaningful contribution by the overall movement to the vision (a world where all people have access to getting their needs met, resolving their conflicts peacefully and creating and participating in networks of worldwide life-serving systems in economics, education, justice, healthcare, and peace-keeping) and mission of CNVC (to contribute to this vision by facilitating the creation of life-serving systems within ourselves, interpersonally, and within organizations).

Stronger connections are possible within the movement to coordinate activities, support each other, share ideas and information etc.

The organizational structure could meet more needs of stake-holders for clarity, connection, identity, contribution, and meaning.

2. Intention

Any models or strategies for organizing such connections be in harmony with the mission and principles of the NVC process and consciousness.

This proposal aims to address some of the needs mentioned but additional strategies may be adopted over time to address the wider network's and its members' needs in full.

The next section is intended to outline initial change suggestions to begin an organizational transformation process that leads to a dynamically adapting life-serving system and that serves the network’s needs while living the process of NVC in the overall community.

3. Proposed Strategy

Create a 'Global Coordinating Circle' (GCC) to serve as the guiding body for the international NVC community and CNVC with the following key roles:

Specific short-term tasks

Long-term perpetuation and representation strategy to determine GCC membership

Establishment of the GCC:

Functioning:
The GCC would meet by phone on a monthly basis initially, and self determine when and how often they will meet in order to fulfill their functions.

John Buck says on June 10th 2006: Right now I am underwriting the cost of implementing sociocracy for NVC through training to local organizations. I soon will be adding teleclasses. I have been donating support for the CNVC board. One teleclass we are developing will focus on facilitating circle meetings. From these classes should come people who can support NVC-related circle meetings. While centralized (CNVC) funding support would be helpful in accelerating this process, the current strategy of funding and building from the bottom up means that the project will succeed only if it is supported fundamentally by the whole network. Thus, there is no "budget" per se as one would have in a centrally managed project.

4. Ideas for consideration by the GCC

The group has the following suggestions for the GCC to consider:

5. Invitation to the network

The network is encouraged to:

6. Suggested requests to groups in the network:

To nominate a candidate for the GCC:

-end of GCC Draft Proposal-

Click here to return to the main CNVC Board page.
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox